CU-CPT9a - TLR8 Inhibitor

Quinoline compound - CAS #2165340-32-7 - InvitroFit™ PRR inhibitor

SPECIFICATIONS

Specifications

Source
Synthetic
Synonyms
2-Methyl-4-(7-methoxyl-4quinolinyl)-phenol
Phenol,4-(7-methoxy4-quinolinyl)-2-methyl
Target

TLR8

CAS number
2165340-32-7
Chemical formula

C17H15NO2

Molecular weight
265.31 g/mol
Purity
≥ 95% (UHPLC)
Solubility

100 mM in DMSO

Reconstitution buffer
DMSO (not provided)
Working concentration

1 - 10 μM

Endotoxin

Negative (tested using EndotoxDetect™ assay)

Tested applications

In vitro cellular assays

Applications

TLR8 inhibition

Quality control

Each lot is functionally tested and validated using cellular assays.

CONTENTS

Contents

  • Product: 
    CU-CPT9a
  • Cat code: 
    inh-cc9a
  • Quantity: 
    10 mg
Includes:

5 ml of CU-CPT9a Diluent

Notes:
  • CU-CPT9a is provided as a dried powder.
  • CU-CPT9a Diluent is provided as a clear solution.

Shipping & Storage

  • Shipping method:  Room temperature
  • Storage:

    • Upon receipt, store CU-CPT9a at -20 °C and CU-CPT9a Diluent at 4 °C
    Stability: Resuspended product is stable for 3 months at -20°C.

    Caution:

    • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles

Details

TLR7 and TLR8

TLR7 and TLR8 are endosomal pattern recognition receptors that share structural homology [1]. Both receptors are activated by single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) molecules, however, they exhibit different ligand-binding specificities and cellular expression patterns suggesting that they have nonredundant specialized roles.

TLR7 is essentially expressed by plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) but is also found in B cells and other myeloid cells [2] while TLR8 is highly expressed by myeloid cells and is absent from pDCs and B cells [2]. 

The endosomal distribution of TLR7 and TLR8 allows them to scan for the presence of microbial RNA in the phagocytic cargo. Their activation leads to NF-κB-, AP1-, and interferon regulatory factor (IRF)-mediated production of type I interferons (IFN-α/β) and pro-inflammatory cytokines [2].

Structural analyses have revealed that both TLR7 and TLR8 possess two binding sites (designated as Site 1 and Site 2) which do not share the same specificities.

Site 1 is highly conserved between TLR7 and TLR8 and binds nucleosides (guanosine (G) for TLR7 and uridine (U) for TLR8) or base analogs. The ligand preference for TLR7 and TLR8 is thus explained by the presence of specific residues in Site 1. Site 1 occupancy allows receptor dimerization and signaling.

Site 2 is less conserved and binds ssRNA with U(U) and U(G) motifs, respectively [3, 4]. Of note, ssRNA-binding to Site 2 is not sufficient for the formation of a signaling-competent TLR dimer but it strongly enhances the binding affinity of Site 1 [3, 4]. Thus, TLR7 and TLR8 appear to sense distinct RNA-degradation products rather than full-length ssRNAs [4].

 

1. Chuang T.H. & Ulevitch R.J., 2000. Cloning and characterization of a sub-family of human toll-like receptors: hTLR7, hTLR8, and hTLR9. Eur Cytokine Netw, 11:372-8.
2. Georg P. & Sander L.E., 2019. Innate sensors that regulate vaccine responses. Curr. Op. Immunol. 59:31.
3. Zhang Z. et al., 2018. Structural analyses of Toll-like receptor 7 reveal detailed RNA sequence specificity and recognition mechanism of agonistic ligands. Cell Rep. 25:3371.
4. Tanji H. et al., 2015. Toll-like receptor 8 senses degradation products of single-stranded RNA. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22:109.

 

Chemical structure of CU-CPT9a

Chemical structure of CU-CPT9a

DOCUMENTS

Documents

CU-CPT9a

Technical Data Sheet

Safety Data Sheet

Safety Data Sheet

Certificate of analysis

Need a CoA ?

CUSTOMER SERVICE & TECHNICAL SUPPORT

Question about this product ?